All thinkers

Philosopher · Contemporary

Ludwig Wittgenstein

1889–1951 · Analytic philosophy; philosophy of language

Outside the Church Secular; baptized Catholic, Jewish descent

Baptized and buried Catholic, with Jewish grandparents; said he could not help seeing every problem from a religious point of view, but never practiced the faith.

The Tractatus drew the limits of what can be said and consigned ethics, God and the mystical to what can only be shown (“whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent”); the Philosophical Investigations replaced that picture with language-games, forms of life and meaning as use, dissolving the Cartesian inner theater. He read Tolstoy's Gospel in the trenches, confessed his sins to friends, and distrusted the spirit of progress.

Why he matters: Elizabeth Anscombe, Peter Geach, Fergus Kerr and the Catholic analytic tradition descend from him; his “grammar” of religious language and his anti-Cartesian account of the soul (“the human body is the best picture of the human soul”) have been used to defend hylomorphism and the sacraments against reductionism.

Where to be careful

The fideism sometimes drawn from him (religious belief as a form of life beyond rational assessment) is contrary to Dei Filius ch. 3–4 on the motives of credibility; his silence about God goes beyond the Church's analogical speech (CCC 39–43); his nominalist “family resemblances” sit uneasily with real natures.

Reading

  • Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
    Ludwig Wittgenstein · Especially 6.4–7 on ethics, God and silence.
  • Philosophical Investigations
    Ludwig Wittgenstein · Language-games, private language, forms of life.
  • Theology after Wittgenstein
    Fergus Kerr, OP · A Dominican shows what theology can learn from him.

Documented positions

Where this thinker stands on each dispute the test covers.

Settled teaching Its center Open question Beyond teaching, not condemned Condemned error
I

God and Being · What is, and whence it is.

Can reason know that God exists? Fideism or agnosticism
Fideism or agnosticism Natural theology
Do natures and essences really exist? Nominalism
Nominalism Realism
How should we speak of God? Apophatic (negative) way
Apophatic (negative) way Cataphatic (analogical) way
II

Faith, Reason and Truth · How we know, and whom we trust.

Faith and reason: who has the last word? Fideism
Rationalism Fideism
Is truth objective? Relativism and pragmatism
Relativism and pragmatism Objective truth
Who interprets revelation? Private judgment
Private judgment Living Tradition and Magisterium
How should Scripture be read? Critical reductionism
Critical reductionism Fundamentalist literalism
III

The Human Person · Soul, body, freedom and the Fall.

Is there a spiritual soul? Mind is brain
Mind is brain Immortal spiritual soul
Is the body really you? Body–soul unity
Dualism Body–soul unity
How fallen is human nature? Totally depraved
Totally depraved Basically good
Marriage, sex and the body's meaning Given by nature and grace
Given by nature and grace Defined by consent and identity
IV

The Moral Life · Law, virtue, conscience and the good.

What is happiness? Beatitude in God
Earthly flourishing Beatitude in God
VI

Church and Society · Authority, the state, wealth and the nation.

Reform or tradition? Guided by tradition
Remake by reason Guided by tradition

A profile of your philosophical and theological leanings, measured against the settled teaching of the Catholic Church, East and West. It is a tool for examination and reading, not an instrument of judgment.

Ad maiorem Dei gloriam.